Tim Stubson Can't Be Allowed on Court
Representative Jeremy Haroldson
Representative Mark Jennings
January 2, 2024
Stop a stranger on the street and ask them how U.S. Supreme Court
Justices are selected. Ever since then-Senator Joe Biden orchestrated
the high-tech lynching
of Clarence Thomas in 1991, Americans have been subjected to highly
politicized and heavily televised Supreme Court nomination proceedings.
But even so, many wouldn’t be able to accurately describe the nomination
and confirmation process.
Even fewer would be able to explain how justices of the Wyoming
Supreme Court get their spots on the bench. Under normal circumstances,
this wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing. The judicial branch was always
intended to be insulated from the political
flames of the day.
But we are not living in normal times. Federal court nominees can’t
explain which branch of government is constructed by Article III of the
U.S. Constitution and openly admit that they don’t know what a woman is,
all while state courts, in unprecedented
form, readily throw candidates from the ballot. Americans have lost
trust in the judiciary, and are paying closer attention than ever.
That’s why it’s important to take note of what’s happening here in
Wyoming. Under current law, Wyoming Supreme Court Justices are required
to retire at age 70. When a vacancy occurs, the state’s Judicial
Nominating Commission (created by Article 5, Section
4 of the Wyoming Constitution) presents three potential candidates to
the Governor, who then has thirty days to pick one as the new Justice.
Wyoming Supreme Court Justice Kieth Kautz, after having served three
decades, will be required by law to retire in March, 2024, and the
Commission has already presented its three names to Governor Gordon:
Stuart Healy (currently serving as District Judge
in Campbell, Crook, and Weston Counties), Robert Jarosh (a Cheyenne
attorney), and Tim Stubson (a Casper attorney).
We are alarmed by the selection of Mr. Stubson, not because we
disagree on nearly every political issue under the sun, but because of
his active participation in divisive, partisan politics. Not only does
Stubson regularly engage in partisan political debates
on social media (which any judicial officer knows to refrain from), Cowboy
State Politics has
discovered that he is currently the chairman of two
active
Political
Action Committees: the Wyoming Caucus PAC and the Team Wyoming PAC.
Serving as the head of a PAC is an inherently partisan activity, which
is why PACs are heavily regulated by the Wyoming Legislature and
Secretary of State’s Office.
Partisan politics are fun. Helping out on a political campaign or
two can be exhilarating, especially when your candidate for Governor
wins. Going on PBS News Hour to share your love for Liz Cheney is
definitely an accomplishment. But these are
not
the kind of activities
an impartial jurist participates in.
Some may cry hypocrisy for us, vocal conservatives, to be raising
these concerns. That would be true if we were seeking a spot on the
bench, but we’re not. We hope that Governor Gordon sees the potential to
bring the Wyoming Supreme Court into disrepute
by placing an active political insider on the bench. If you agree that
an active partisan has no role on the bench, contact Governor Gordon’s
office at 307-777-7434. After all, in Wyoming, the buck stops with the
Governor as our state’s system lacks a senate
confirmation process. Once Governor Gordon makes his pick, this person
goes straight to the Court. Please urge him to avoid the partisan
choice.
Jeremy Haroldson represents House District 4, Laramie and Platte Counties; Mark Jennings Represents House District 30 in Sheridan County