Lessons in Conservatism
Representative Mark Jennings
January 4, 2024
I have watched with great interest the dueling op-eds
between conservatives in the Wyoming House of Representatives and those members
trying desperately to convince our state that they are conservative. Sometimes it is difficult to tell the
difference between the genuine article and the cheap knock-off—especially in
campaign season.
Some members of the House have come up with what they are
calling “The Conservative Commitment to Wyoming.” I had to chuckle because while some of their
proposals sound good, they’ll have devastating effects for Wyoming
Citizens. The infamous Inflation
Reduction Act comes to mind. If their
proposals really were conservative and in the best interests of Wyoming, of
course we conservatives would be in support of them. As my 31 friends on the other side are not
accustomed to acting the least bit conservative, I’d like to offer my
assistance in their new venture.
I noticed that there are a few, tiny details that weren’t
mentioned in their “Conservative Commitment:”
First, while I’m impressed that the other side now thinks a
cap on property tax increases is a good idea, they’re still failing to
understand the financial strain Wyoming families are currently under. House Bill 18, the Property Tax Inflation
Cap, really does only one thing: guarantees your taxes will go up 5% every
year. That’s 5% from where they are
now. There is no accounting for the
dramatic increases we have all experienced the last few years. What’s more, in 14 years, your property taxes
will double. Instead of the possible 5%
allowable increase, it will be considered by County Assessors and the
Department of Revenue to be mandatory.
No doubt, this was just an oversight.
It brought a grin to my face to see our friends on the other
side come around to the idea of education savings accounts. In their haste to push out what is no doubt
an exciting piece of legislation for them it appears they’ve missed a few
things—namely the Wyoming Constitution.
The bill purports to provide state money to lesser income families to
educate their children how they see fit: home school, private school or
otherwise.
In their numerous political missives about the matter, our
normally less than conservative colleagues forgot to mention Article 3, section
36. “No appropriation shall be made for
charitable, industrial, educational, or benevolent purposes to any
person, corporation or community not under the absolute control of
the state.” In other words, if your
family took ESA money for your children, it would be no different than if they
attended the public school you are trying to get away from. “Absolute control” means absolute control. It’s no small wonder why the Buffalo Bulletin
said this bill would “protect the integrity of the public education
system.” Their “conservative” bill would
be no different than the current public education system.
As they voted an average of 85% with the Democrats in the
last session and being new to conservatism, I’m not surprised in the least that
my 31 normally left-leaning friends missed the second problem with their ESA
bill. As a general rule, it is not
conservative to create brand-new entitlements.
In Wyoming, pre-kindergarten education is either handled by parents
directly or by ministerial pre-school programs and not by the state.
House Bill 19, the Education Savings Accounts bill, would
essentially create state sponsored pre-schools in Wyoming to the detriment of
existing pre-school programs. New
“conservatives” often miss Article 7 section 12 of our Constitution which
prevents state monies from going to any religious institution or program. This is what we real conservatives call
“picking winners and losers.” And it is
yet another thing that we disagree with.
Creating new entitlements and vastly expanding government is and never
has been a conservative plan.
While I have been delighted to impart my knowledge of
conservatism to those who are potentially interested in this style of
governing, it’s pretty clear that the “Conservative” Commitment to Wyoming is
anything but that. Rather, it’s just
another example of 31 people attempting to appear conservative while they
continue to vote with and push policies for the Democrats. Actual Conservatives wouldn’t do that either.
Mark Jennings represents House District 30 in Sheridan County. He is the pastor of the Cowboy Church of the Bighorns.